Confusing ‘reasonable consumer’ split in Florida courts


Law360 (June 28, 2021, 4:42 p.m. EDT) – At least since 1903 – when Judge Richard Collins, acting as master of the rolls in the English Court of Appeal ruling on the defamation of McQuire v. Western Morning News Co., discussed the “reasonable man” standard as a “man on the Clapham Highway” point of view[1] – lawyers and judges in all countries with common law traditions have grappled with this standard.[2]

In this column, we take a look at different issues under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Business Practices Act, or FDUTPA, and highlight areas in which the courts are divided. One place where decisions diverge is the question of who decides …

Stay one step ahead

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You need to know what’s going on with customers, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to stay an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data in articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of prosecution, etc.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, requests, etc.
  • Create personalized alerts for specific case articles and topics and more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS


Source link

Previous 10 best car covers for Toyota Camry
Next 5 auto startups offering hassle-free / self-care services for your car

No Comment

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *